The Spaniards and the Italians have some excellent plays to their credit, and they divided them into three Acts and not into five. No faith to represent in their works.
So their tragedies lacked the charm of novelty. On the other hand, Neander defends rhyme as it briefly and clearly explains everything. Neander asserts that "we have invented, increased, -and perfected a more pleasant way of writing for the stage.
French drama raises perfection but has no soul or emotions as it primarily focuses on plot. We are unable to appreciate the art and beauty of their language, only because many of their customs, stories, etc, are not known to us.
Moreover, in his discussion of the ancients versus the moderns, in his defense of the use of rhyme, and in his argument concerning Aristotelian prescripts for drama, Dryden depicts and reflects upon the tastes of literate Europeans who shaped the cultural climate in France and England for a century.
Drama is, as Aristotle wrote, an imitation of life, and it is successful as it reflects human nature clearly. French drama raises perfection but has no soul or emotions as it primarily focuses on plot.
These four critical positions deal with five issues. Crites laments that his contemporaries will never equal the standard set by the Greeks and the Romans. Eugenius proceeds to bring out some defects of the Ancients, and some excellences of the Moderns.
Have you read these? Thus their drama is really an imitation of life. Eugenius, Crites, Lisideius, and Neander.
The English, on the other hand, try to have all kinds of places, even far off countries, shown within a single play. They are often too bold in their metaphors and in their coinages. They do not adhere to rules as well.
He also discusses the three unities, rules dear to both the classicist and the neoclassicist, requiring that a play take place in one locale during one day, and that it encompass one action or plot. In the controversy Dryden takes no extreme position and is sensible enough to give the Ancients their respect.
Mixture of Tragedy and Comedy Dryden is more considerate in his attitude towards the mingling of the tragic and the comic elements and emotions in the plays. Their greater labor makes them superior in science as well in poetry. He brings up the idea of the suspension of disbelief.
The stage is supposed to represent many countries. In short, English drama has sub-plots; broadness in imagination and unities rules of Shakespeare. In other words, comic scene produces relief, though Dryden does not explicitly say so.
Means… Dryden does not disparage the ancients. He proposes that Crites choose one literary genre for comparison and initiate the discussion. And now days, Moderns are neither suitably honored nor are rewarded.
Although it is clear that Dryden uses Neander as a mouthpiece for his own views about drama, he is careful to allow his other characters to present cogent arguments for the literature of the classical period, of France, and of Renaissance England.
Euripides, a great dramatist, no doubt, confines his action to one day, but, then, he commits many absurdities. If they had tragic-comedies, perhaps Aristotle would have revised his rules.Literary Theory and Criticism.
Literary Theory and Criticism; Unit1: Plato and Aristotle; Unit 2: John Dryden An Essay on Dramatic Poesy: Crites develops the main points in defending the ancients and raises objections to modern plays.
The Moderns are still imitating the Ancients and using their forms and subjects, relying on. An Essay of Dramatic Poesy by John Dryden: An Overview An Essay of Dramatic Poesy gives an explicit account of neo-classical theory of art in general.
Dryden is a neoclassic critic, and as such he deals in his criticism with issues of form and morality in drama. In a nutshell, John Dryden in his essay, An Essay on Dramatic Poesy, gives an account of the Neo-classical theory.
He defends the classical drama saying that. An Essay of Dramatic Poesy by John Dryden: An Overview An Essay of Dramatic Poesy gives an explicit account of neo-classical theory of art in general. Dryden is a neoclassic critic, and as such he deals in his criticism with issues of form and morality in drama.
John Dryden’s Of Dramatic Poesie (also known as An Essay of Dramatic Poesy) is an exposition of several of the major critical positions of the time, set out in a semidramatic form that gives life to the abstract theories.
John Dryden in his essay “ An Essay on Dramatic Poesy ”, gives an account of Neo-classical drama saying that it is an imitation of life, and reflects human nature clearly. He also discusses the three unities, rules that requires a play to take in one place, during one day and that it develops one single actions or plot.Download